| Conundrum: "Anything that arouses
curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained,
inexplicable, or secret." Whenever I
mention the following set of facts, it either
arouses perplexity, or generates a completely
blank stare.
1) To know all of your 40-generation ancestry
(back to about the time of Charlemagne) requires
filling in over one trillion boxes on your
ancestor chart.
2) The fortieth column of the chart (about 700
A.D., plus or minus a century) requires filling
in over 500 billion boxes.
3) There was definitely a person in each of
those boxes, or you would not have been born (at
least you would not have been born as you).
4) The world population just passed six
billion people.
The conundrum is this: If there are only
slightly more than six billion people on the
planet today, who belongs in those more than 500
billion boxes on your ancestor chart about 12
centuries ago?
Actually, there's only one possible
explanation. The people in those more than 500
billion boxes cannot all be different
individuals. A large number of the individuals
from that time period each belong in a great
number of different boxes on your chart.
This explanation either arouses more
perplexity, or reinforces the completely blank
stare. Descent from ancestors in two lines is
usually a difficult concept for most people to
grasp, so telling people that they have sometimes
tens of thousands of different ancestral pathways
leading to some of their individual ancestors
almost always creates disbelief.
But this is not just a theory of mine. This is
the picture that appears from digitally
connecting the dots of 2,000+ years of ancestral
history according to where the experts say those
dots should be connected. Anyone who explores the
Odyssey Edition of the A&E Family Forest will
see countless examples of exactly how this
happens.
What is still a theory of mine is that enough
fully-sourced connections are in place in the new
Odyssey Edition to produce 40-generation pedigree
charts for some people with more than 1/100th of
1% of the boxes filled in. As insignificant as
that tiny percent sounds, in this case it
requires filling in at least 109,951,163 boxes
with the names of one's ancestors.
As certain as I feel about this, I can't prove
it yet because my combination of hardware and
software quits counting just before it reaches
3.7 million boxes. Does anyone have the
technology yet to confirm this theory?
|